Federalization Passes the House

I saw on Jack Mack's blog that Wendy Doromal's blog is reporting that S. 2739 has passed the House of Representatives. It passed 291-117. It now goes to the President's desk for final approval. Both houses have enough votes to override a presidential veto, if there were to be one, so I think we can assume this is a done deal.

We're having an election on November 7. We're going to elect our first delegate to congress. Who do you think should run? Who do you think should win?

Another Round of Press

I forwarded my letter to the editor to the TV station, KSPN, and they did a story. Ken and Ike were interviewed, as were Senate President Pete Reyes and Senator Paul Manglona. John Gourley was interviewed as well.

I think this story did a good job of explaining the position we are in.

I'm glad the Senate clarified their position. Senator Paul is quoted as saying, "The Senate is very much in support of any national monument or national park where we protect our environment, I want to put that on the record."

They just need more information. Well, information is coming. The scientific and the economic reports will be out in May and some people will be coming out to talk to us about Hawaii.

The newspapers had another round of letters today, including the letter that I published on my blog yesterday.

Greg Cruz of Taotao Tano responded to Jose Cabrera's letter from yesterday. I guess the lesson to be learned here is, "Don't mess with Greg Cruz."

Donald Cohen wrote a letter attacking the Senate, saying they were wasting their time with the Monument. I'd have to disagree. The Monument is going to lead to one of the largest investments the CNMI has seen in a while. The Senate is right on in giving it attention.

Laurie Peterka wrote a letter explaining her motivations behind supporting the Monument.

Chuck Sayon announces that the Mariana Island Nature Alliance has voted to support the Monument. He promises a series of letters explaining their position.

Blogger Meetup Tomorrow

We're having a blogger meetup tomorrow (Wednesdsay) afternoon at 360. We'll meet at 5 PM. There is no agenda for the meetup, we'll just hang out like we used to.

I wonder if Lil Hammerhead will make an appearance?

Rick, I'll bring those pictures of your restaurant taken in 1981.

******
Grand Theft Auto IV comes out...well, today. I may buy the game, but I'll also have to purchase a TV and Playstation 3. Anybody want to loan me some money?

More Local Support

The Marianas Resource Conservation & Development Council's Vice President has written to the Governor to express his support for the proposed "National Park of the Sea."

In my previous post I wrote that the proposal is unlikely to survive the month without a showing of considerable community support. This letter is a step in the right direction.

******
The newspapers have been alive with discussion the last two days.

Jaime Vergara, sixth grade teacher at San Vicente Elementary, wrote:

I was stunned when our leaders up the hill legislated their fears. I have an image of scared and spineless ghosts (as opposed to the forceful and dynamic personalities they exhibited during the political campaign) shaking in their loafers and pumps before the shadows of the ubiquitous un-homogenous feds (there’s just as much diversity in ’em Wash. DC-based bureaucrats as any!), and rather uncivil to a civic group called Ocean Legacy, not to mention a guy named Angelo and his PEW.

Ruth L. Tighe in her column wrote: “The proposal has been deemed a “no-brainer” by most who are aware of the proposal-with its protection of marine resources, its promise of world-wide attention to the CNMI, its assurance of increased tourism, scientific research, economic investment-all at no cost to the CNMI-what is there to object to?”

Jane Mack wrote her first letter. I'm sure there will be more. She says:

The national marine monument will also produce income, possibly more than the commercial fishing interests presently operating. We can expect to see a tourist center in Saipan. We could revitalize our tourism industry with promotions of eco-tourism. We could see people from around the world seeking to visit this national marine monument. We can also help improve our CNMI image, so tarnished by the lingering imprint of human trafficking of sex workers and sweatshop labor abuses. Instead, we could share our natural beauty with the world and be known as an ecological haven, a “green” bit of paradise.

I support the creation of national marine monument. We need this. We need it now.

Ken Kramer, who has lived on Rota and Saipan, wrote a very long, sarcastic letter. He writes:

And, finally, who needed the Ocean Legacy or the Pew Charitable Trust, anyway? Who needed the annual influx of $10-$20 million dollars of federal funding for the CNMI? What for? Who cares or wanted all those good paying jobs? All those jobs the local people could have had, could have prepared for by studying courses at NMC; they are all gone: Poof! And: "We Don’t Need No Stinkin Visitor’s Center!" It would just bring in more of those troublesome tourists and an annual budget of millions. WESPAC thinks that World Heritage status for the NW Hawaiian Islands would harm it, because it would draw too many tourists. So, the conclusion to be drawn from WESPAC, is that we may not want to create the monument in the Northern Mariana Islands at all, because it might attract too many tourists. The CNMI wouldn’t look good, having all those tourists and researchers coming to Saipan, Tinian, and Rota, spending money, staying in hotels, renting cars, chartering boats, investing in the CNMI, and eating at restaurants. How can that possibly help the CNMI? Are we not doing just fine without all that money? After all, it only represents about 10 percent of the annual CNMI budget. Please, do not count the spin-off value of those dollars.

Wes Bogdan finally had his letter published on the Internet, too.

Brad Doerr also wrote a letter. He wrote:

I was a bit disappointed by the recent legislative resolution against our proposed marine monument in the Northern Islands. I too was a bit apprehensive when I first heard the proposal back in December of 2007. Years ago, my parents taught me to look twice before crossing the street. Nowadays I look four or five times before I take those first steps. I guess that was good advice since I have never been hit by a car. All of us have learned that lesson. So I understand the Legislature's abrupt reaction and united stand against our proposed marine monument. They have justification. The U.S. government has screwed over everybody. But it has money. The CNMI has received millions of dollars in federal aid over the years. What most people do not know is that the federal government did not propose our marine monument; the Pew Foundation did after a through analysis of possible worldwide sites for a marine monument. PEW did not push this proposal, it simply presented it to the CNMI. Since the legislative resolution against our marine monument, Pew has moved on. The decision to proceed is ours. So after reading this letter, write to the editor, governor, President of the U.S. and voice your opinion. For or against. It is your right. Use it. I do. That is the voice of the people.

******
We also had a negative letter, written by Joe Cabrera. I might as well address this letter point by point.

I’VE been hearing lots about Pew, Angelo V., the National Park and now Taotao Tano says they like the idea of Northern Islands National Monument or whatever it is Mr. Angelo is calling it now. Let me take a load off my shoulders. Why won't anyone say my last name? What's up with that?

This idea of a National Monument being or trying to be imposed on our three northernmost islands sounds like it will benefit only the dive operators and divers. The only mention of benefiting fishermen, regardless of what type of fishing is done, is that the CNMI registered fishing vessels CAN fish up there but we CANNOT take our catch out of the boundaries of the park. No wonder Mr. Angelo can’t get support for his pet project! In your forum, held at Porky’s on Thursday the 24th, it was mentioned that you may get support for your pet project if this restriction can be changed. There are many benefits to fishermen. The Division of Fish of Wildlife has got posters available printed with the benefits of protected areas. If this proposal were to be considered by the White House, there would be a period of public comment. That is a great place to make your suggestions.

You were also asked, “Why are you pushing for a National Park?” Your reply was, “Because its a good idea.” Is that the best you can come up with? You can do better than that! After all, you were educated in the U.S. This is a good idea. I had just finished giving a 45 minute presentation on why I support this project. Were you listening?

You also mentioned money for the CNMI. Your presentation showed millions of dollars. My question is, “How much of that will come to the CNMI?” We are but a speck in Oceania. How much will actually go into local government coffers? The actual percentage that goes to the local government will be worked out by the federal and the local governments working together. Athline Clark from the Hawaiian Monument explains the breakdown in her email which I posted previously.

You also mentioned jobs for locals. Your presentation also showed a number jobs that will be available. Dude, how many locals will qualify for those jobs you showed on your presentation? I say none for a long time until we get educated in those fields of study. The jobs that I listed are similar to the jobs at Division of Fish & Wildlife. Are you saying that nobody at DFW is qualified for their jobs? I don't think so. Who would want all those high paying jobs anyway? Are you suggesting that we only look for low paying jobs for locals?

My advice to you Mr. Angelo is that when you put on a presentation again you better be prepared to answer ALL question put your way. I answered every question I was asked.

Don’t you just hate it when someone tries to shove something down your throat and the best answer they can come up with is, “Oh, I’m not an economist,” or, “Oh, I’m not a scientist.” Prepare yourself to save face. Wisdom is understanding that you don't know everything. Pew Environment Group has commissioned an economic study and a scientific study. Why is it wrong for me to defer to experts? The studies will be available to the public in May.

To Mr.Taotao Tano. When you announced that Taotao Tano is supporting the idea of a National Park in your media release you listed all the benefits. But did you mention the setbacks, the negatives and the restrictions that will be imposed on the local people that your organization is supposedly looking out for? Folks, Mr. Taotao Tano needs to sit down with Mr. John Gourley and study the proposal in detail. Mr. Taotao Tano also has to study the Northern Hawaiian Islands National Park in detail before he agrees to support this Park to the north. Soooo much restrictions in the Hawaiian National Park. Restrictions are a part of protected areas. That is how they are protected from destructive use.

Did you know that the Hawaiian National Park to the north employs Hawaiian islanders (not native Hawaiians) and a few native Hawaiians? What percentage of Hawaiians are native Hawaiians? It is not very high. I think the Superintendent is native, so at least the Monument is heading by someone of indigenous heritage.

Did you know that the Hawaiian fishermen were bought out and supposedly received millions? NOT! And did you know that there is NO fishing there anymore? Completely outlawed! Mr. Taotao Tano, is this what you want for our future generations? Your organization is supposed to be advocating indigenous rights and culture. You are not doing that! So please do not criticize Tina S. because you and your organization are no better. You were a no-show at Porky’s, too. There is fishing going on in the Hawaiian Monument right now. There were exactly eight fishing vessels permitted to be in the area before it was declared a Monument. After the Monument was designated, they were given 5 more years to fish. At the end of five years, their boats will be purchased at fair market value.

Did you know that there is a fledgling company here and on Rota that is trying to establish a fishery in the CNMI? They have spent millions already starting the business. Well, if Pew, the National Park and Mr. Angelo get their way, this company will shut down and take their business elsewhere. Another loss in revenue for our broke government. Think about it! The ocean is a big place. There are plenty of places to fish. If the business goes out of business, it won't be because of the Monument. It will be because of gas prices and lack of fish. It is my belief that the revenue from the Monument will be greater than the revenue from fishing. The economic study will settle this.

To the Senate: A big thank you for not entertaining the National Park issue. It only stands to benefit a certain few. Conservation as a rule benefits everyone. The Monument will benefit local fishermen because it will keep foreign fishing vessels out of our northern waters.

JOE CABRERA
Dandan, Saipan

Monumental Loss

I submitted the following letter to the editor late last night. I wanted to have it ready in time for yesterday's paper, but it needed a bit more work. There isn't much need to explain the letter. It is pretty self explanatory.

Dear Editor:

There has been an overwhelming amount of news and editorials about the proposed, “National Park of the Sea.” I would like to clarify a few points.

The federal government – as I have said publicly time and time again in every single presentation I have made – is considering doing some additional monuments and several have been proposed by groups outside the government. The attached map highlights the many proposed projects under consideration by the White House. Pew Environment Group’s proposed project is the Mariana Trench Marine National Monument.

The federal government has done nothing public regarding the CNMI proposed project and has invested zero effort into investigating its merits to date. All work has been done by Pew Environment Group, which is a private entity. It is not now and never has been a government proposed project. That is why there has been no dialog between the federal government and the local government.

Last week the Legislature passed a joint resolution that was reported in the press as being in opposition to the proposed protected area. The next day, the headline on the front page of the paper read, “Marine Monument Nixed.” The article went on to say that the resolution read, “the Senate on behalf of the People of the CNMI, the House concurring, does not support the establishment, creation, or designation of a marine monument, marine sanctuary, or national park in the vicinity of any of the Northern Islands of the CNMI.”

In the resolution, there is no period at the end of the word CNMI. The papers failed to print that the resolution continues with, “at this time and feels that study, discussion, and deliberation is necessary before any further action is taken.”

The White House has been in dialogue with the various private groups, such as Pew Environment Group, and is going to make a decision within the next week or two as to whether or not they should start looking at potential monuments that are not too controversial. The joint resolution, with the accompanying exaggerated press, puts the CNMI proposed project in the “too controversial to be considered” column. We will know within one to two weeks if the White House will reject the concept permanently.

It is not our belief that the Legislature passed the resolution with the intent of killing this proposed project, but they may have unknowingly done so because the word choices within the resolution imply total opposition. The headline “Marine Monument Nixed” has also sent a very strong message. The damage may be impossible to undue.

It is our belief that the White House will now likely choose another proposed project over the Mariana Trench Marine National Monument given the lack of leadership support. Pew Environment Group had a charter boat trip planned for June. National Geographic and videographers working with Jean-Michel Cousteau, the son of the famous marine explorer, were going to be on board this investigative trip. The proposed project may be off the table before the trip starts. Therefore, the trip, along with the international exposure that would have accompanied it, has been canceled.

The economic study and the scientific study commissioned by Pew Environment Group will be ready in May, but it may be too late, as again, the proposed project may be off the table in the upcoming weeks.

Let me be clear: the process to create a monument in the CNMI is only in its infancy. If the CNMI wanted to explore this proposed project, there would be public forums, a task force, and plenty of opportunity for local input. Unfortunately, the proposal may be killed before it had a chance to start. The White House will not consider any proposed project that hints of controversy.

The Pew Environment Group wants this proposed project to happen, but only if the people of the CNMI want it. With that said, the only chance this proposed project has of even getting started is for an upwelling of community support and a letter of clarification from the Legislature saying that they would like more information before the proposed project is shelved.

Angelo Villagomez
Fina Sisu

We Lost?

Hear us roar: My teammates celebrate moments after Steve McKagan (#4) scored a tying goal to force an overtime. Photo credit: Wes Bogdan.

We lost the game 3-2. They scored, then we scored to tie it up. Then they scored again to end the half at 2-1. We scored again in the second half, to force an overtime. The first overtime went scoreless, but Guam scored in the last 30 seconds of the second overtime to win the game.

Doesn't matter.

We can compete and did compete with a FIFA ranked team. I'm a Boston Red Sox fan. There is always next year.

Information Direct from Hawaii

The following is an email from Athline M. Clark, who is the State Co-Manager for the Papahanaumokuakea Marine National Monument. This email is in response to a request for more information on the experience in creating Hawaii's Monument. The request stated, "I wanted to ask for your assistance in obtaining some information about how much involvement is the State of Hawaii is in the co-management of the Monument."

I promised to send you more information after we met in DC, and events overtook me so here is my preliminary thoughts with more to come.

* In the public process to create the Monument there were 52,000 public comments received on the proposed federal actions and 25,000 comments received on proposed State actions. Almost all calling for strong and lasting protections to be placed on this site.

* At the time the Monument was created, there were 8 federally permitted bottomfishing boats and a few handline vessels doing commercial fishing in the Monument. Commercial fishing will be phased out in 2011 but can continue until this time.

* The Monument allows for traditional and customary practices by Native Hawaiians. The regulations state that nothing can be sold.

* In addition to Native Hawaiian subsistence fishing and gathering, sustenance fishing for consumption while in the Monument is allowed if permitted. Vessels can troll, catch and eat the fish while in the Monument.

* Native Hawaiians were involved in a BIG way in the crafting of the language to protect this place, on selecting the name, and continue to have strong input into all management decisions via the Office of Hawaiian Affairs and a cultural working group. ALL activities taking place in the Monument are considered for BOTH their natural and cultural values and weighted equally.

* One of the key things that was done early on was the formation of a cultural working group, made up of kupuna (elders), practitioners, and cultural experts. They helped set the bar and craft the vision for Native Hawaiian involvement. It would be REALLY important for you all in Saipan to set up a similar committee and seek their input. In our experience, it is through their vision and their collective wisdom that we in part, where we are. The group MUST be made up of RECOGNIZED and legitimate practitioners. You do need a few key strong advocates to assist in organizing the group but they must agree on their own on who has standing.

* The Proclamation does not diminish or enhance State's jurisdiction and authority. The site is co-managed. All activities occurring in State's waters MUST have authorized State signature and agreement.

* All activities occurring in the Monument must be permitted. This ensures that there is a way to track and enforce illegal activity.

* Some of the key things to consider and request from CEQ and Pew include:

1. Funds to be at the table and co-manage the site.
2. A new educational facility to provide outreach on the islands and marine ecosystems.
3. A seat at the table in decision-making and a co-management agreement.
4. Funds to operate the education facility, for the co-manager and other staff support.
5. An agreed upon opportunity for traditional cultural practices to continue, to the extent they do not harm or diminish the resources, based on input from a cultural working group made up of indigenous Chamorros and Carolinians....
6. Assistance and support for enforcement of regulations within the site created.

* While the models in Hawaii include the Papahanaumokuakea Marine National Monument AND the Hawaiian Islands Humpback Whale National Marine Sanctuary, there are similar models in Am. Samoa at Fangatele Bay. In Am. Samoa, over 75% of the federal funds to manage the site go directly to support Am. Samoa gov. employees managing the site. There is only a small true federal presence with an assistant manager who is a federal FTE.

* In Hawaii, the State, NOAA and FWS co-manage the Monument and NOAA and the State co-manage the Whale Sanctuary. 25% of the federal budget for the Whale Sanctuary goes to the State for State supported positions. The amount provided to the State for the Monumennt is less but still supports critical positions. This type of model also exists for the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary, where MOST of the staff are State staff, including a Dept. Superintendent, 18 enforcement officers, and outreach staff.

* Having this type of partnership has not only provided direct funding for positions, and created new visitor centers/educational facilities in each site I have mentioned, it has also brought other assets including new vessels, training opportunities, research, enforcement support, and more.


During our process to move forward on managing our vast area together we have signed several MOA's. Two are attached and I hope they help.



Aloha

Athline M. Clark
State Co-Manager
Papahanaumokuakea Marine National Monument
Hawaii Division of Aquatic Resources
Department of Land and Natural Resources
1151 Punchbowl St. Rm. 330
Honolulu, Hawaii 96813
(808) 587-0099 voice
(808) 587-0115 fax

Please let me know if you would like a copy of the MOAs. I can email them to you along with more information. I also encourage you to contact the Park in Hawaii for more information.

Paying Dividends

The very first flame tree that Beautify CNMI planted is sprouting blossoms this year. This and the other trees that we have planted over the last two years will add to our island beauty for years to come. I'm thankful to have been able to be a part of this movement.

Happy Earth Week.

Game Day

The women put on one hell of a show yesterday by stuffing Guam 0-0. Guam is a FIFA ranked team. I think they are #75 in the world. Yesterday they couldn't beat a rag tag bunch of island girls.

Go CNMI!

Our game is in about 6 hours. I won't be starting this game, but I should get a few minutes towards the end of the game to rip stuff up. I really want to win this game.

2008 CNMI Men's National Team

Here we are. The game is Sunday at 3 PM at Ada Field. Come out and cheer #9 (that's me).

Guam, are you ready?

Is it time to play yet?

The Internet is on Fire

The House and Senate passed a resolution on the proposed "National Park of the Sea." It's my first resolution. Ever.

Not everyone agrees with what they have done and the Internet is abuzz with commentary.

Harry Blalock, local radio station manager and avid diver writes:

And that brings me to the other monumental show of ignorance recently by this self-important body. The House of Representatives voted Thursday by a vote of 17-3 approving a resolution asking President Bush not to unilaterally declare a marine sanctuary around the islands of Uracas, Maug and Asuncion. The 3 who voted against the resolution were Representatives Tina Sablan, Heinz Hofschneider and Edward Salas. The Senate unanimously adopted the resolution earlier in the week. I realize there are people on both sides of this debate and issue, but honestly those who have come out against it have motives that are more than a little suspect, and their track records are less than stellar when it comes to the environment. I believe it is always a mistake though to take sides on an issue before thoroughly familiarizing yourself with it. After all, how can you vote on something if you haven’t bothered to educate yourself on it? Do you really think that reading a few letters to the editor in the newspaper qualifies you as being properly educated? Did the lawmakers bother to actually find out how the public actually feels about this proposed marine sanctuary? Did they hold any public hearings on the matter before issuing their resolution? Or do they think they have some kind of ESP that informs them automatically what the majority of their constituency thinks about any particular matter at any given time? Again, these supposed “representatives” of the people decided they already knew what you wanted and thought, and therefore they didn’t need to ask you, they would just go ahead and speak for you, whether it represented how you truly felt or not. In my mind the most prudent thing to do at this point would have been to hold public hearings, do some more investigation into exactly what this would mean for the CNMI, and maybe find out how the marine sanctuary in the northern Hawaiian Islands has been working out.

Tami Hunter, mother of three and business manager, writes:

The front pages of today's papers made me sick to my stomach!!!! "Senate says no to national monument proposal". "Marine Monument Nixed"....Why? because according to the Senate, the majority of local people will not support the proposal...WTF!!!!!!!!!!!! HOW WOULD THEY KNOW???? DID ANY OF THEM EVER ASK THE LOCAL PEOPLE HOW WE FEEL???? I'M A "LOCAL PEOPLE" AND I LOVE THE IDEA! HAVE ANY OF THEM BEEN READING THE LETTERS OF SUPPORT TO THE EDITOR???? OR ATTENDING ANY OF THE PRESENTATIONS THAT ANGELO HAS BEEN GIVING????????? ARGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!

Lil Hammerhead, anonymous blogger than seems to have lived here for a very long time, writes:

I'm not going to go on and on about the Marine Monument idea. It's a great idea, and I've yet to meet anyone in the public who doesn't think it is a great idea.

Wes Bogdan, long time CNMI attorney (sorry, no link, but it was in the Variety), writes:

The opportunity to create a NMI Marine National Monument (Pew Monument) is a brilliant idea, a gift from heaven at an exceptionally dark moment in time for the CNMI. It is hard to imagine how anyone could possibly be against it. For starters, the creation of such a monument would instantly begin changing the world’s perception of Saipan from a alien sweat-shop full of prostitutes and non-resident workers to world class eco-friendly tourist destination. A place where we care about our planet. The arguments against the Pew Monument which have appeared in letters to the editor in your paper and which have been made by some government officials in reporter’s articles miss the point. And this is the point: Humans and their activities are slowly killing the world we live in and the CNMI has been presented with a golden opportunity to save a tiny part of the planet. Saving any part of the planet that we can is the right thing to do period. All the silly arguments made against this proposal pertaining to who gets to manage (exploit) the resources found in and around the islands in the future are part of the problem–not the solution.

The actual resolution, which is negative in tone, actually describes what has to happen for the Legislature to support this initiative. They want more information and hard numbers, so we've been meeting on a daily basis with people in the community and we've commissioned a scientific and an economic report. Both reports will be available in May.

******
The bloggers just won't quit!

Rick, an environmentalist living in San Francisco I have never met, gives a point by point analysis and finishes with:

But we're not talking about a pie-in-the-sky, unproven approach here. It's an ambitious vision based on already working exemplars. Consultants and expertise are just neighbor island groups away. And it creates a tangible, realistic, and inspirational goal for stakeholders--young and old, elected and electorate--to rally around.

Then Mike Tripp, pleasantly polite father of two, writes:

Thanks to all those who came out to hear the facts, to debate the issues and to discuss the concept. I know it is controversial on a number of fronts but, keeping an open mind and becoming informed rather than rejecting the idea all together because a few think it is a bad idea or have their own agendas will do no one any good.

I, for one, am like many of these people. I'm getting to know the facts and hear both sides of the issue from those who care. Once I feel I have the necessary answers to my own questions I'll weigh in on the matter more thoroughly.

To do anything less is just plain irresponsible!

******
The fire continues...

Mark Powell, a blogging scientist in the mainland, writes:

Conservationists have responded to the loss of natural refuges by asking for man-made refuges, places closed to some or all fishing. It's a common sense concept championed by smart fishermen in rivers and lakes, and some courageous ocean fishing leaders. But, sadly, most ocean fishermen have chosen to fight rather than join the refuge effort. Angelo over at Saipan Blog reports the sad news that refuges won't happen right now in the Mariana Islands, and Rick at Malaria, Bed Bugs, Sea Lice and Sunsets points out a possibly nefarious effort by fishing interests to stop these refuges.

CR McClain, contributor to Deep Sea News, a science blog with a technorati score about 100 times higher than mine, writes:

In the backass wisdom that is the CNMI Legislature, they have adopted a resolution opposing the proposed Northern Islands Marine National Monument. It looks like the logo "You'll Love How Deep We Go" will not see daylight. The reasons for the blockage ranges from stupid to idiotic to just plane asinine.

I feel it is important to point out that none of these blogs are against the idea of a monument. I would post it if somebody put it up, but not a single blogger has come out against it, whether living in the CNMI or anywhere else in the world.

With that said, I'm not responsible for what the other bloggers write. I'm just reposting a few snippets to give an idea of the tone of their post. If you want to read each post, just click on the link.

******
The newspapers were very one sided in their reporting that "the Senate on behalf of the People of the CNMI, the House concurring, does not support the establishment, creation, or designation of a marine monument, marine sanctuary, or national park in the vicinity of any of the Northern Islands of the CNMI," they failed to mention that it was immediately followed with "at this time and feels that study, discussion, and deliberation is necessary before any further action is taken."

Again, just like the governor's original letter, the phrase "at this time" is used.

However, without a strong showing of local support, the White House will probably take the proposal off the table and this opportunity for jobs, federal funds, a visitors center, years of positive international attention, and increased reserach, training, and education, not to mention the chance to protect our islands and our waters for generations to come, will simply sail away.

******
Jane Mack adds:

For all of you who voted against the marine national monument, you've lost my support. For some, I'm not in your district, so JJCamacho, feel free to ignore me. Don't bother smiling at me next time. Ralph Torres, you have a beautiful family. Don't mind my tears as I think how your children and future grandchildren will suffer for an ocean that you failed to protect. For those who never had my support, enjoy whatever those corrupting influences are putting in your pocket. You can't take it with you when you die.

I am working on a response to the resolution. Hopefully I can get it in Tuesday's newspaper.

Ken Kramer Strikes Back

Ken Kramer had another letter to the editor published in the newspaper today.

Letter to the Editor: Marine monument

ONE of the concerns being raised about the proposed “Marianas Trench Marine Monument” is that it would preclude an underwater mining industry one hundred years down the road.

Let’s do some math: The total area of the proposed “National Park of the Sea” is about 115,000 square miles, while the world’s oceans cover over 138,000,000 (138 million) square miles. 115,000 divided by 138,000,000 equals 0.08 percent of the world’s oceans.

The area of ocean contained in the proposed protected area, which is over 300 miles north of Saipan, encompasses less than one tenth of one percent of the ocean floor.

The odds are not that great (based on the area of the world’s oceans) that the proposed monument area is going to be the site of some dubious valuable mineral resources or that these alleged minerals, if present, would be the most likely to be mined first, or within the next few decades. Need I mention pozzolan?

Deep sea mining is in its infancy and with the exception of diamond mining in shallow waters off Namibia, no mining at any depth is commercially producing in the world today, never mind a mining industry in the deepest part of the ocean, hundreds of miles away from the nearest port.

Then, if the technology were to be finally developed, mining will likely start first in developing countries with lax environmental laws, not in waters under United States jurisdiction. American environmental laws would not allow the level of destruction, contamination, and sedimentation that a developing country would allow, making it cheaper to mine in developing countries. Is the devastation of the marine environment what mining proponents are advocating?

Finally, this issue still ignores the fact that the CNMI already tried to sue the federal government for the mineral rights and lost. The CNMI does not control a single square inch of the submerged lands around our islands. I know that this is a hard pill for some to swallow, but it is true. See: United States (U.S.) District Court for the Northern Mariana Islands: Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands v. United States of America, No. 99-0028 (Aug. 7, 2003).

However, as I explained in my previous letter to the editor, designating a monument would give the CNMI co-management over our waters for the first time in our history.

The monument will create jobs, add to government coffers, bring unprecedented worldwide positive attention, lead to the building of a visitors center on Saipan, Tinian, or Rota, will keep illegal foreign fishing vessels out of our waters, and most importantly, the last remaining wilderness in the Marianas will remain wild. Our great grand children will always have that marine sanctuary to know what these islands were like before concrete, poker parlors, and midterm elections became a way of life in the CNMI.

KEN KRAMER
Marianas RC&D Coordinator

Marianas Dive Meeting

Last night I presented the proposal for a "National Park of the Sea" to Marianas Dive at Porky's Bar. The place was packed with hardly an empty seat to be had.

In addition to divers, a large contingent of fishermen were there, including Jim Davies, who I personally invited. After I gave the presentation we had a spirited discussion. I explained my understanding of monuments to the best of my ability. I talked about there being an opportunity to participate in the process. I told them that local livelihoods and needs would be taken into consideration.

Discussion is good. It helps me get a feel for people's support. For example, one of the fishermen from last night admitted that he supports the idea, he just wants his concerns to be addressed.

A gentleman from Hawaii named Phil Westbrook was there. He got pretty heated when I talked about the sunset clause for the existing 8 vessels and how those boats were going to be bought out at the end of five years. He argued that he had lobster fisherman friends who didn't get paid when the monument was created, but I pointed out that the lobster fishery was closed years before by court order. The fishery was mismanaged by WESPAC and there are no more lobster.

He told me I was wrong. I told him I'd look it up. I was right.

John Gourley was there, too. This was his fourth time attending a presentation. He must really be in support!

Just kidding.

John was there to harp on the co-management agreement. Again. His argument is basically, "I don't trust the Federal government."

Well, the Force was with me this morning, because this article was published in the Honolulu Advertiser this morning:

Many ideas for Hawaii marine preserve
It's not too late to have your say on how to run vast marine monument

By Dan Nakaso
Advertiser Staff Writer

More than 57,000 comments so far have resulted in a preliminary plan to manage the Papahanaumokuakea Marine National Monument, and government officials want even more input on how to run the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands over the next 15 years.

The four-volume, 1,200-page draft of the management plan is so massive that Gov. Linda Lingle joked yesterday that she probably won't read it herself and will leave the details to the experts.

But at a Washington Place ceremony yesterday attended by Lynn Scarlett, deputy secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior, and retired Vice Adm. Conrad C. Lautenbacher Jr., NOAA administrator, Lingle encouraged citizens to send even more input on the management plan for the country's largest protected marine area, which spans nearly 140,000 square miles.

William Aila served on the monument's advisory council and the Native Hawaiian advisory panel to the advisory council and attended yesterday's ceremony. He likes what he's seen so far since President Bush designated the area a marine national monument in 2006.

Aila agrees with most of the rules, such as requiring Native Hawaiians who follow traditional gathering practices to consume harvested foods within the monument. And having U.S. Fish and Wildlife personnel escort cultural practitioners lets both sides better understand each other's points of view, Aila said.

But Aila hopes the final management plan allows for traditional exceptions, such as continuing to allow a few dozen people from Ni'ihau to bring salt, bird feathers and fish out of the monument and back to family on Ni'ihau and Kaua'i as they have for generations.

"Salt is plentiful in the main Hawaiian Islands," Aila said. "But salt from special places has mana."

"The rules that are in place are good," Aila said, "but there is room to make exceptions in special cases."

The Northwestern Hawaiian Islands are home to more than 7,000 marine species, a quarter of which are found nowhere else. The islands are the primary habitat for critically endangered Hawaiian monk seals and green sea turtles, and thousands of sea birds and plant species.

The state of Hawai'i, the U.S. Department of the Interior and the U.S. Department of Commerce are responsible for managing the monument in accordance with the presidential proclamation that established it.

Lingle concluded yesterday's ceremony by thanking the dozens of people in the audience who fought for the Papahanaumo-kuakea Marine National Monument.

"Had you not stuck with it, government on its own would not have done this. I'm confident of that," Lingle said. [emphasis mine]

This article confirms a lot of what I have been saying about Papahanaumokuakea in my presentations.

There is co-management.

There is an on-going process with lots of input from the community.

It is supported by the Native Hawaiian community.

It allows for traditional cultural practices.

Oreo Kenobi

Gus sent me this picture of Oreo. One of these days I'll get tired of posting pictures of my dog.

Price of Gas Hurting Fishermen

The price of gas on Saipan is $4.32. That is nuts. The price of fish hasn't gone up in 10 years.

The price of fish has to go up.

Mariana Trench update

If you didn't gleam it from my last post, I'll be making the "National Park of the Sea" presentation to Marianas Dive tonight at Porky's around 7:30 PM. I am the second of two speakers. Mike Tripp has more info on his blog.

There has been more support for the proposed park online and in the newspapers.

Jaime Vergara wrote:

I read with bewilderment John Gourley’s opposition to the NMI Marine National Monument (PEW Monument) being proposed by the PEW Foundation. To be sure, his opposition is based on his long-term involvement in the marine science and environmental regulatory fields and his personal belief in supporting sustainable fisheries programs. But that might precisely be the point: sustainable fisheries understood simple as profit bottom line economics and coupled by a mistaken notion of stewardship based on paper sovereignty, and one can understand where he is coming from. Who cares about the transmigration patterns of fish life and the depleted ocean stock now prevailing? How do we audit the debit inflicted on Mother Nature’s processes now that we have overfished the seas?

Then local elementary school principal Boni Reyes, mother of four, wrote:

I am enthralled with the thought of a sanctuary. Sanctuary. Say it with me. A hiding place. A place of refuge. I can't remember how many times I've needed safe harbor. There were countless times I found my solace near the water's edge, looking out into our horizon, knowing that I was inextricably tied to it.

It's more than heritage or culture.
The ocean defines us.
It is more than our responsibility to care about it.
Out of respect and awe, we must protect it.

Finally, let's not forget Tami Hunter. She wrote:

If you grew up in Saipan, if you have been here for any length of time, you can see the enormous changes that have taken place in our lagoons as well as in the oceans surrounding our islands. Waters that were once abundant with fish, sea urchins, octopus, and clams are now stripped of many of these things. We desperately need CONSERVATION measures that are in place and more importantly ENFORCED! And even though the "National Park of the Sea" will be hundreds of miles away from Saipan, if we can conserve that area of our island chain for future generations, I believe we are taking a HUGE step in the right direction. The publicity we will receive from having a "National Park", the jobs that will be created, the boost to the economy, all that is just icing on the cake, the cake itself is CONSERVATION!

I'll give more updates at the meeting, including what we have in store for the next two months. If you can't make the meeting, please contact me and we can set something up so that you can see the presentation. I should be done traveling for the next few weeks, although I would like to get over to Tinian or Rota for a few days.

An Open Letter to Mr. Jim Davies

Dear Jim,

First and foremost, I would like to thank you for your support of Beautify CNMI in the past. It was great of you to participate in our cleanup of Paupau Beach all those months ago and I've seen you wearing your Beautify CNMI! t-shirt proudly in the community.

The reason I'm writing this is that I read your letter to the editor published in today's Marianas Variety, and I must say, you have been grossly misinformed.

Why don't you come to the Marianas Dive meeting tonight at Porky's? I'll be presenting the actual proposal for the Marianas Trench Marine Monument. You can see the proposal and ask any questions you might have.

No hard feelings.

Some people have been lying to you and I think you deserve to hear the truth.

Hope to see you later tonight,

Angelo

******
Thanks for coming to the meeting, Jim.

2008 Marianas Cup

This Sunday the Northern Mariana Islands national football team will suit up for a game against our neighbors to the south, Guam. The game starts at 3 PM at Ada Field in Susupe.

Please come out and cheer for #9.

Saipan's Sexiest Male Dog Model

Have you seen the latest issue of Hafa Adai magazine? Oreo is featured in it. Taking into consideration his past work with PTI, he's making quite a splash in the male dog modeling world.

Pineapple Ball Pictures

I decided last minute to go to the Pineapple Ball at the Hyatt.

The recipient of the funds raised this year was MINA, so I sort of felt obliged.

Although I didn't register for the auction, I still manged to buy two things. I bought a $150 gift certificate for a travel agency and a travel DVD player for $75 (what a deal!) and I bought a one night package at the Hyatt's new spa for $350 (kind of expensive, but valued at $700!)

What can I say, Robert Torres is a great auctioneer?

I'm going to give the spa package to my Mom and Jim when they visit in June. I figure I'll let them experience about two weeks of island life, then let them spend the night at the Hyatt while I watch my brother and sister.

Here are a few pictures:


The cocktail party at the Hyatt ended right around 10 PM. Some people (like me) went to Godfather's afterwards.

And yes, that is George Hasselback, Saipan Male Model, singing in a tuxedo.

Blog Candy I

Tamara introduced me to the concept of blog candy.

Basically a blogger offers up a free gift for commenters to win. In order to win, other bloggers have to leave a comment and then link back to the contest on their own blogs. The blogger hosting the blog candy contest then selects a winner.

I like the idea, so I'm going to make blog candy a feature of the Saipan Blog.

So for my first blog candy contest, I'm asking bloggers to write about why they support the proposed "National Park of the Sea" for the area encompassing the Mariana Trench and the islands of Maug, Asuncion, and Uracas. The post must have a link back to this post. Leave a comment on this blog after you post your reason on your blog.

The prize will be a copy of The Unnatural History of the Sea by Callum Roberts and a copy of the latest issue of MP magazine. Here is a short review of the book:

Humanity can make short work of the oceans’ creatures. In 1741, hungry explorers discovered herds of Steller’s sea cow in the Bering Strait, and in less than thirty years, the amiable beast had been harpooned into extinction. It’s a classic story, but a key fact is often omitted. Bering Island was the last redoubt of a species that had been decimated by hunting and habitat loss years before the explorers set sail.

As Callum M. Roberts reveals in The Unnatural History of the Sea, the oceans’ bounty didn’t disappear overnight. While today’s fishing industry is ruthlessly efficient, intense exploitation began not in the modern era, or even with the dawn of industrialization, but in the eleventh century in medieval Europe. Roberts explores this long and colorful history of commercial fishing, taking readers around the world and through the centuries to witness the transformation of the seas.

Drawing on firsthand accounts of early explorers, pirates, merchants, fishers, and travelers, the book recreates the oceans of the past: waters teeming with whales, sea lions, sea otters, turtles, and giant fish. The abundance of marine life described by fifteenth century seafarers is almost unimaginable today, but Roberts both brings it alive and artfully traces its depletion. Collapsing fisheries, he shows, are simply the latest chapter in a long history of unfettered commercialization of the seas.

The story does not end with an empty ocean. Instead, Roberts describes how we might restore the splendor and prosperity of the seas through smarter management of our resources and some simple restraint. From the coasts of Florida to New Zealand, marine reserves have fostered spectacular recovery of plants and animals to levels not seen in a century. They prove that history need not repeat itself: we can leave the oceans richer than we found them.

This contest will end on Earth Day at midnight EST (that is 2 PM Chamorro Standard Time the following day).